Various Studies Confirming the Risks of…
Please note, the studies below are only a small handful of studies that confirm radio/microwave emissions are hazardous to your health.
1971 – Unites States Navy
Author: Naval Medical Research Institute
It is very clear in this report that microwave and radio-frequency radiation has ‘hazardous health effects to humans and was well known prior to 1971’!
Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena Effects and Clinical Manifestations of Microwave & Radio Frequency Radiation
More than 2000 references on the biological responses to radio-frequency and microwave radiation, published up to June 1971, are included in the bibliography. Particular attention has been paid to the effects on man of non-ionizing radiation at these frequencies.
1992 – United States Air Force Study
Authors: C.-K.Chou, A.W.Guy, L.L.Kunz, R.B.Johnson, J.J. Crowley, J.H.Krupp from the US Airforce Bioelectromagnetics Research Laboratory
(This study was completed in 1984 by the Air force, but was not published until 1992, and became available on the internet in 2005).
The finding was of a near fourfold increase of primary malignancies in the exposed animals compared to those not exposed to low-level microwave.
1996 – Poland Military Study
By: Department of Biological Effect of Non-Ionizing Radiations, Center for Radiobiology and Radiation Safety at the Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland
This study was based on a 14 year period of 1971-1985. The study revealed that persons occupationally exposed to RF emissions were nearly twice as likely to develop brain tumors, 13.9 times more likely to develop chronic myeocylic leukemia, 8.62 times more likely to develop acute myeoblastic leukemia and 5.82 times more likely to develop non-hodgkin lymphomas.
2001 – TETRA Report for Police Federation (England & Wales)
Author: Retired Military Microwave specialist Dr Barry Trower
Confidential Report on TETRA for Police Federation 2001
This report confirms the extreme hazards microwave electromagnetic frequencies generate. Dr. Trower explains how these frequencies cause damage to the body and points out the hazardous health effects involved. Countries using the TETRA System
2010 Video: Dr Trower speaks out about the TETRA System Recommended to Watch This video interview was done with The World Foundation for Natural Science in 2010. It explains the TETRA situation and health hazards in an easy to understand way. The Dangers of Microwave Technology – TETRA Airwave System / Tetra Radio
2004 – Dr Barry Trower warns about illness and death from TETRA – TETRA a Critical Overview by Dr B Trower, August 2004
2013 – 2013 Research report Humanity on the BRINK by Dr Barry Trower
This Research Report has been written for all students and non‐scientists to be able to understand.
2001 – New Zealand Study
Author: Dr Neil Cherry
A study based on many research papers – Conclusion – A somewhat more comprehensive review of the scientific evidence of genotoxicity, cancer, brain tumor and astrocytoma from chronic pulsed microwave exposure shows that the risk is real and significant.
The safe level of exposure of this toxic agent is zero for human populations. The police officer concerned had his head regularly exposed to a pulsed radar signal from a traffic radar over an 8 year period, at intensities 23 to 167 times higher than the level that significant DNA damage has been observed. Hence he had a real and significant risk of developing a brain tumor. His astrocytoma shows that he did.
2002 – New Zealand Study
Author: Dr Neil Cherry
The research results to date clearly show that cell phones and cell phone radiation are a strong risk factor for all of the adverse health effects identified for EMR because they share the same biological mechanisms.
The greatest risk is to cell phone users because of the high exposure to their heads and the great sensitivity of brain tissue and brain. Cell sites radio/TV towers and radars are risk factors for: Cancer across all body organs especially brain tumour, breast cancer and leukaemia.
Dr Cherry also noted various healths effects – Cardiac arrhythmia, heart attack and heart disease, Neurological effects, including sleep disturbance, learning difficulties, senility, depression and suicide. Miscarriage, congenital malformation, Sudden Infant Death syndrome, early childhood cancer, especially Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL).
2004 Germany Study
Authors: Horst Eger, Klaus Uwe Hagen, Birgitt Lucas, Peter Vogel, Helmut Voit
The result of this retrospective study in Naila shows that the risk of newly developing cancer was three times higher among those patients who had lived during past ten years (1994-2004), within a distance of 400m from the cellular transmitter, in comparison to those who had lived further away.
2004 Israel Study
Authors: Ronni Wolf MD, Danny Wolf MD
This study indicated an association between increased incidence of cancer and living in proximity to a Cell Tower. Those living near a Cell Tower are 4.15 times more likely to develop cancer.
2009 – Canadian Study
Author: Dr Magda Havas
Dirty Electricity Elevates Blood Sugar Among Electrically Sensitive Diabetics and May Explain Brittle Diabetes
In addition to lifestyle and genetics, the environment appears to be another factor contributing to high levels of blood sugar. This concept presents a possible paradigm shift in the way we think about diabetes and the consequences may be far reaching. As a result, we have labeled environmental diabetes as Type 3 diabetes.
A Comprehensive List of various research papers
By New Zealander Dr Neil Cherry
2011 – Brazil Study
Authors: Adilza C. Dode a,b,e,⁎, Mônica M.D. Leão c, Francisco de A.F. Tejo d, Antônio C.R. Gomes e, Daiana C. Dode e, f, Michael C. Dode e, Cristina W. Moreira b, Vânia A. Condessa b, Cláudia Albinatti b, Waleska T. Caiaffa
This study found mortality rates and the relative risk were higher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m from the BS (base station also known as a cell tower), compared to the average mortality rate of the entire city, and a decreased dose response gradient was observed for residents who lived farther away from the Base Station.
2011 (May) – Interphone – International Study
Authors: Various countries
Conclusion: There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma in long-term mobile phone users with high RF exposure and of similar, but apparently much smaller, increases in meningioma risk.
The uncertainty of these results requires that they be replicated before a causal interpretation can be made. Note: This Interphone study was an on going one, the final results published in November 2011 state further investigation is needed – UICC_Report_Final_03102011
2011 – World Health Organization
May 31,2011 – The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. (Group 2B) – Based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use. The full report…
2011 – Court Declaration by Retired Military Microwave specialist Dr Barry Trower
Author: Dr Barry Trower
Declaration to the United States District Court or Oregon, about the risks of WIFI technology. In conclusion, even so-called ‘low’ levels of microwave radiation are very serious!
2011 – (Updated 2014) International Experts Perspective
By: Various researchers
Key resolutions, appeals, and declarations released by expert scientific groups around the world since 1998, regarding the biological and health effects of both low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) associated with electricity and radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation (EMR) generated by wireless devices.
2013 – Canada/U.S.A Case Study of Four Women
Authors: John G. West, Nimmi S. Kapoor, Shu-Yuan Liao, June W. Chen, Lisa Bailey,Robert A. Nagourney
Breast cancer occurring in women under the age of 40 is uncommon in the absence of family history or genetic predisposition, and prompts the exploration of other possible exposures or environmental risks.
We report a case series of four young women—ages from 21 to 39—with multifocal invasive breast cancer that raises the concern of a possible association with nonionizing radiation of
electromagnetic field exposures from cellular phones.
Although the numbers of reported cases here are too small to have a scientific conclusion, the findings are intriguing and support the notion that direct cellular phone contact may be associated with the development of breast carcinoma.
2013 U.K/India Study
Authors: Mushtaq Ahmed Bhat, Vijay Kumar, Gupta.G.K
This study found that electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile phone and mobile phone towers are harmful for the people who are living nearby the transmission towers, so people should keep away from the transmission towers and people should limit their use of mobile phones.
2014 – France Study
Authors: Gaëlle Coureau, Ghislaine Bouvier, Pierre Lebailly, Pascale Fabbro-Peray, Anne Gruber, Karen Leffondre, Jean-Sebastien Guillamo, Hugues Loiseau, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Roger Salamon, Isabelle Baldi
A total of 253 gliomas, 194 meningiomas and 892 matched controls selected from the local electoral rolls were analyzed. No association with brain tumors was observed when comparing regular mobile phone users with non-users. Conclusion: Our data supports previous findings concerning a possible association between heavy mobile phone use and brain tumors.
2015 – Switzerland Study
Authors: Sultan Ayoub Meo ,, Yazeed Alsubaie , Zaid Almubarak , Hisham Almutawa , Yazeed AlQasem and Rana Muhammed Hasanato
Exposure to high RF-EMFR generated by MPBS is associated with an elevated level of HbA1c and prevalence of pre-diabetes Mellitus among school-aged adolescents. RF-EMFR appears to be another risk factor contributing to high levels of HbA1c and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This study provides awareness to the community and to the health officials regarding the effects of RF-EMFR generated by MPBS on HbA1c and its association with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
We cannot deny the services provided by the mobile phone industry but we also strongly believe that health is more important and it cannot be compromised over anything.
Thus, it must be kept in mind the mobile MPBS should not be installed in the thickly populated areas, especially in or near the school buildings.
2015 – Scientists Appeal To United Nations to Protect Public Against Health Risks
On 11th May 2015 a group of over 160 scientists from across the globe, with over 2000 peer-reviewed studies to back up their concerns of the severe health risks of EMF’s, appealed to the United Nations (UN) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to put greater protection against the severe health risks the emissions of EMF’s – (also known as radio frequencies, microwave frequencies – non-iodizing radiation) can cause.
Researchers at the renowned Ramazzini Institute in Italy have announced alarming results of a large-scale lifetime study.
Final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley
rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission.
Cell Phone Radiation Lawsuits May Get a Boost from Italian Supreme Court Ruling
(Court ruling in 2012)
Italy’s highest court has upheld a lower court ruling that a brain tumor suffered by a heavy mobile phone user was caused by cell phone radiation.
Some legal experts believe the Italian Supreme Court’s finding of a causal link between cell phone radiation and brain tumors could inspire more people to pursue cell phone radiation lawsuits. View full article at Consumer Injury Lawyers
Nokia to Pay Compensation to Phone-tower
Worker Who got Rare Cancer
(Court ruling in 2014)
The Seventh Chamber of the Paraná Regional Labor Court (TRT-PR) determined payment of compensation to a Curitiba technician who worked for fifteen years in the maintenance of telephone towers and developed a rare type of bone cancer.
The antennas were not turned off during the execution of the service… The full article in Italian by TRT-PR – An english version EMR Health Alliance
Court Allows Expert Testimony in Litigation
Alleging Cell Phone-Linked Tumors,
According to Consumers’ Legal Team
(Court Ruling in 2014)
WASHINGTON, Aug. 8, 2014 /PRNewswire/ — A Washington, D.C. superior court ruled that five scientific expert witnesses can testify for consumers suffering from brain tumors allegedly caused or promoted by cell phone use, Ashcraft & Gerel LLP, Morganroth and Morganroth, PLLC, Lundy, Lundy, Soileau & South, L.L.P. and co-counsel said today.
Jeffrey B. Morganroth, of Morganroth and Morganroth PLLC, said, “We now have opinions and testimony from prominent scientific experts that will be admissible and support our clients’ claims that cell phone radiation can cause brain tumors in humans. With this landmark ruling, the cases are moving forward to fact discovery.”
Each of the plaintiffs in the litigation suffers from a brain tumor or is suing for a family of someone who died of brain cancer.
The first of the consolidated cases is “Michael Patrick Murray, et al., v. Motorola, Inc., et al.,” Case No. 2001 CA 008479 B in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia. The defendants in the cases are Motorola, Inc., Qualcomm, Inc., Nokia, Inc., Audiovox Communications Corp., and Samsung Telecomm American, LLC.
The plaintiffs are represented by Morganroth and Morganroth, PLLC, of Birmingham, Mich.; Ashcraft & Gerel LLP, of Washington, D.C., and Lundy, Lundy, Soileau & South, LLP, of Lake Charles, La.; The Knoll Law Firm, LLC, of Marksville, La.; Pribanic & Pribanic, LLC, of Pittsburgh; Frasier, Frasier & Hickman, LLP, of Tulsa, Okla.; and Bernstein Liebhard, LLP, of New York.
View full article here
Many government departments and communications companies claimed cell phones (that also emit radio/microwave emissions) were safe, and now there are many lawsuits going on regarding the severe health effects including cancer this device has caused.
In knowledge of this, many governments still fail to ensure the public are kept safe and made fully aware of the truth about all WIFI technology. Instead, they are pushing it onto young children in schools and at home.
Be sure to share this article with your friends, to help stop our children from enduring the severe long-term health effects of WIFI technology.
Dr Magda Havas
Anti-Cell Tower Lawyers
Health Canada Admits Safety Code 6 Guideline for Microwave Radiation is Based ONLY on Thermal Effects!
Cell Phone Radiation and EMFs – Be prepared to be surprised
Video –Cell Tower Cancer Clusters
Microwave News – 1994
MOTOROLA MEMO – 1994
BBC (2012) – Canadian Government is ‘Muzzling its Scientists’
Safety TIPS for Cell Phone Users
Article posted: 24/09/19